PRESCRIBE, DON'T
DESCRIBE
by Brian Habit
July 15, 2003
Don't Describe
Many people try to use astrology to
tell fortunes, to describe what a person is like and which events will
happen in a person's life. These predictions tend to sound specific and
certain. For example:
"You're a Scorpio, so
you are stubborn
and passionate." This describes how a person is.
"April
will be
an awful month. You will
let your anger get the best of you when talking to your boss, and you
will lose your job. May will
be a wonderful month. ..." This describes what
will happen in a person's life.
Now, I do think that astrology can be
used to predict events, such as losing a job. (Such
predictions will sometimes be correct.) However, it's more accurate in
predicting feelings that a person will experience, such
as feeling sad about your job. (Such predictions will be correct more
often.) It's even more accurate in prediciting developmental
issues or themes that a person will experience, such as the
theme of needing to improve the fit between your abilities and your
responsibilities in your job. (Such predictions will be correct even
more often).
I think these last types of predictions
(those about developmental issues or themes) are the most helpful kind,
because they focus on the level of meaning (rather than
changes in external circumstances or even
psychological changes). They allow more room for exploring
choices that are available to someone.
Depending mainly on the choices that a
person makes at the level of meaning, the likelihood is greater that he
or she will, in turn, experience external circumstances or psychological
changes.
For example, if you're experiencing a
theme of needing to increase your independence at work, but you choose
to avoid dealing with this, you might be more likely to have
accidents or get into arguments (external circumstances) or to feel
irritable (psychological change). We can talk about a destructive choice
such as this, and we can also discuss a creative choice. (See below.)
Prescribe
What I mean by prescribing is that I
believe astrologers should help a person be aware of he choices
available to her or him and recommend what she or he should do, in order
to have the happiest, most spiritually fulfilling life that's available
based on the natal charts, transits to it, etc. In other words,
astrology should be used to "write a prescription" for what a person
needs to incorporate into or add to his or her life. This includes
telling people about a range of choices available to them, including the
creative and destructive consequences that they can expect based
on various choices. For example:
"You're Scorpio, and your Sun is in
the 6th house, so you need experiences
that will help you develop your passion in your work life." This
prescribes certain types of experiences.
"You may tend to act stubbornly, but
if you do that during
April, be careful that you don't step on toes.
One possibility is that
your boss fires you [one choice with destructive consequences, in
terms of external circumstances] and you feel furious [psychological
change]. On the other hand,
if
you talk to your boss courageously and considerately about
improving the fit between your responsibilities and your abilities,
then you might be
able to have a more independent role in your current job [another
choice with creative consequences, in terms of external circumstances]
and feel liberated and more self-confident [psychological change]. You're
in a process of needing to improve this fit. [This gets at the
developmental issue or theme.]"
Which kind of astrology seems more
helpful to you: descriptive astrology or prescriptive astrology? Which
helps a person feel more empowered?
© Brian Habit - The Proud
Phoenix, 2004
(All Rights Reserved)
Return to the list of articles